COMMUNITY PARTNERS FOR HEALTHY FARMING INTERVENTION RELEASE DATE: April 9, 2003 RFA: OH-03-004 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Department of Health and Human Services (http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/homepage.html) CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE NUMBER(S): CFDA 93.956 LETTER OF INTENT RECEIPT DATE: May 27, 2003 APPLICATION RECEIPT DATE: June 13, 2003 THIS RFA CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION o Purpose of the RFA o Research Objectives o Mechanism(s)of Support o Funds Available o Eligible Institutions o Individuals Eligible to Become Principal Investigators o Special Requirements o Where to Send Inquiries o Letter of Intent o Submitting an Application o Peer Review Process o Review Criteria o Receipt and Review Schedule o Award Criteria o Required Federal Citations PURPOSE OF THIS RFA The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) announces the availability of fiscal year (FY) 2003 funds for a cooperative agreement program for Community Partners for Healthy Farming Intervention. This program addresses the "Healthy People 2010" focus areas of Educational and Community-Based Programs and Occupational Safety and Health. The purpose of this cooperative agreement is to develop community-based farm safety and health interventions research and prevention projects through partnerships with researchers, workers, farm managers, local agricultural communities, and other stakeholders. This announcement identifies program needs consistent with the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) developed by NIOSH and partners in the public and private sectors to provide a framework to guide occupational safety and health research in the new millennium towards topics which are most pressing and most likely to yield gains to the worker and the nation. The agenda identifies 21 research priority areas. The NORA priority areas with specific relevance to this announcement are: traumatic injuries and intervention effectiveness research. Information about NORA is available through the NIOSH Home Page; http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/nora/ RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Background Agriculture consistently ranks as one of the most hazardous industries in the United States. Acute traumatic injury and accidental death are among the most significant and striking occupational hazards in agriculture. There were approximately 26 deaths per 100,000 workers in the agricultural sector [agriculture, forestry, and fishing] during 1999. The average annual fatality rate for the United States civilian working population for this same time period was approximately five deaths per 100,000 workers. Of special concern are the children (over 100) killed each year while involved in farm activities. Each day approximately 500 agricultural workers suffer lost-work- time injuries, and about five percent of these result in permanent impairment. Those who work in agriculture are also at increased risk for occupational morbidity from musculoskeletal disorders, certain cancers, reproductive disorders, dermatological conditions, zoonotic diseases, hearing loss, stress related mental disorders, and occupational lung diseases. Farm tractors, farm machinery, stored grain silos, power lines, manure pits, and livestock are among the many hazards workers are exposed to in agricultural workplaces. Hired workers, farm owner-operators, and unpaid family members who live in the work environment are at risk from the health and safety hazards of farming in the United States. The number of hired workers varies widely by season from 600,000 to 950,000 workers [United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Agricultural Statistics Service, Farm Labor, 1995 & 1996]. USDA data show 5.9 million persons own, operate, and manage farms or are family members who live on these farms (Farm Costs and Return Survey, 1993). It is unknown how many children and other family members of migrant or seasonal workers who are not recorded as working are at risk. These agricultural workers and their families experience a disproportionate share of fatalities, injuries, and diseases associated with many physical, chemical, and biological hazards. Many agriculture workers are not covered by the same protections as workers in other occupations (e.g., workers' compensation, Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations), and data on such injuries may not be available or may underestimate the scope of the problem. Furthermore, unlike other industries, farm children begin working at a young age, are at risk to many occupational hazards while working or living at the worksite, and experience injuries and fatalities at a younger age than in other industries. In December, 1994, an external review panel was convened to conduct an evaluation of the NIOSH Agriculture Initiative. The panel recommended that NIOSH continue its support of the Agriculture Initiative and promote the development of community-based research and prevention projects which will link the traditionally supported research and surveillance projects directly to the agricultural community. The panel encouraged enhanced collaboration between those engaged in research and those engaged in intervention/prevention activities at the community level. This program is responsive to these recommendations through the development of a cooperative agreement to conduct community-based pilot intervention or demonstration research projects at the community level. In these efforts, CDC/NIOSH encourages the formation of partnerships with public health, research organizations, and community-based groups serving agricultural populations. Goals The goal of this intervention/prevention research program is to prevent occupationally related disease and injury in the agriculture industry through community-based intervention or demonstration projects aimed at piloting and evaluating regulatory, behavioral, education, control or other interventions. It is intended that these goals will be accomplished through the development of partnerships with researchers and agricultural community groups or populations in order that interventions/preventions are piloted and evaluated within the agricultural working population. The focus for agricultural workplace safety and health intervention efforts can include specific engineering control technologies, information dissemination and health communication practices, worker/management participatory safety and health programs, and family and community safety and health training. Although many intervention strategies have been applied to various work settings, knowledge about the most effective is limited. Employers, owner-operators, agricultural workers, public decision makers, cooperative extension services agents, and others need this information to make informed decisions about which prevention strategies work well and support the use of limited resources. Research is needed to pilot and evaluate intervention/prevention efforts which, if successful, will be applicable at the regional or national level. This work should be conducted in cooperation with agricultural workers and employers to insure consideration of specific economic and organizational factors that determine if interventions will be adopted by a particular population. Cultural, educational, gender, geographical, and other related characteristics of at risk populations will influence how safety and health messages are designed, distributed, and received. Farm workers (including migrant, seasonal, minority, and permanent employees as well as women and children of the agricultural community) and agricultural organizations should join efforts to identify appropriate techniques for information dissemination and develop outcome measurements which can be utilized to determine the effectiveness of various dissemination efforts. Useful References Healthy People 2010 (Full Report: Stock No. 017-001-00547-9). Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. 20402-9325. Telephone (202) 512-1800 or visit the internet site: http://www.healthypeople.gov/ MECHANISM OF SUPPORT This RFA will use NIOSH (U01) award mechanism. As an applicant you will be solely responsible for planning, directing, and executing the proposed project. This RFA is a one-time solicitation. The anticipated award date is September 1, 2003 and will be made for a 12-month budget period. Continuation awards within the project period will be made on the basis of satisfactory progress and availability of funds. This RFA uses just-in-time concepts. This RFA requires the detailed budget format, rather than the modular grant budget format. This program does not require cost sharing as defined in the current NIH Grants Policy Statement at https://grants.nih.gov/archive/grants/policy/nihgps/part_i.htm#matchorcost. The NIOSH (U01)is a research project cooperative agreement award mechanism in which the Principal Investigator retains the primary responsibility and dominant role for planning, directing, and executing the proposed project, with NIOSH/CDC staff being substantially involved as a partner with the Principal Investigator, as described under the section "Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of Award". FUNDS AVAILABILE NIOSH/CDC intends to commit approximately $850,000 in FY 2003 to fund five to seven awards to support a community partners for healthy farming intervention program. An applicant may request a project period of up to four years and a budget for direct costs of up to $180,000 per year. Because the nature and scope of the proposed research will vary from application to application, it is anticipated that the size and duration of each award will also vary. Although the financial plans of NIOSH provide support for this program, awards pursuant to this RFA are contingent upon the availability of funds and the receipt of a sufficient number of meritorious applications. At this time, it is not known if this RFA will be reissued. Continuation awards within a project period will be made on the basis of satisfactory progress and the availability of funds. Use of Funds Applicants should include in their budget travel funds for one trip per year for an annual meeting with other principal investigators and NIOSH/CDC scientists to be held in Morgantown, West Virginia. ELIGIBLE INSTITUTIONS You may submit (an) application (s) if your institution has any of the following characteristics: o For-profit or non-profit organizations o Public or private institutions, such as universities, colleges, hospitals, and laboratories. o Units of State and local governments o Eligible agencies of the Federal government o Domestic and foreign o Faith-based or community-based organizations o Indian Tribes, Tribal Governments, Colleges, and/or Organizations INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE TO BECOME PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS Any individual with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed program is invited to work with their institution to develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply for NIOSH/CDC programs. Note: Title 2 United States Code section 1611 states that an organization described in section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code that engages in lobbying activities is not eligible to receive Federal funds constituting an award, grant, or loan. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Terms and Conditions of Award The Terms and Conditions of Award, below, will be incorporated in all awards issued as a result of this RFA. It is critical that each applicant include specific plans for responding to these terms. These special Terms of Award are in addition to and not in lieu of otherwise applicable OMB administrative guidelines, HHS Grant Administration Regulations in 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92, and PHS Grants Policy Statement. The administrative and funding instrument used for this program is a research project cooperative agreement (U01), an assistance mechanism (rather than an acquisition mechanism) in which substantial NIOSH scientific and/or programmatic involvement with the awardee is anticipated during performance of the activity. Under the cooperative agreement, the NIOSH purpose is to support and/or stimulate the recipient's activity by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the award recipient in a partner role, but it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activity. Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility for the activity resides with the awardee(s) for the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities in carrying out the studies will be shared among the awardees and the NIOSH collaborators where appropriate, including the following. 1. Recipient Responsibilities The recipient will coordinate project activities, scientifically and administratively at the awarded institution and at the other sites that may be supported by sub-contractors to this award. The applicant will have primary authority and responsibility to define objectives and approaches; to plan, conduct, and analyze data; and to publish results, interpretations, and conclusions of studies conducted under the terms and conditions of the cooperative agreement award. Recipient will: a. provide study participants with individual notification letters when medical tests are performed, b. develop and submit semiannual progress reports in a standard format that is agreed upon after an award is made, c. provide program management oversight for the project, and d. notify study participants of the overall study results. 2. NIOSH Staff Responsibilities NIOSH will have substantial scientific programmatic involvement during conduct of this activity, through technical assistance, advice, and coordination. NIOSH staff will: a. Serve as a scientific liaison between the awardee and other program staff at NIOSH with experience in the occupational health issues of MSDs and epidemiology; b. provide expert consultation in the area of occupational epidemiology; c. provide technical advice on monitoring of field data collection, developing operating guidelines, quality control procedures, and developing policies/protocols for dealing with recurrent situations; d. facilitate collaborative efforts to compile and disseminate program results through presentations and publications, e. assist in the development of human subjects protocols for the CDC Institutional Review Board (if required) and in the preparation of OMB (and other) clearances that may be required during the conduct of the study. WHERE TO SEND INQUIRIES We encourage inquiries concerning this RFA and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants. Inquiries may fall into three areas: scientific/research, peer review, and financial or grants management issues. o Direct your questions about scientific/research issues to: Adele Childress, Ph.D., MSPH Scientific Program Administrator Office of Extramural Programs Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 1600 Clifton Road, N.E. Building 24, Room 1427, MS E-74 Atlanta, GA 30333 Telephone: (404) 498-2509 FAX: (404) 498-2571 Email: achildress@cdc.gov o Direct your questions about the NIOSH agricultural program to: Stephen Olenchock, Ph.D. Agriculture Coordinator Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 1095 Willowdale Road, P04/1119 Morgantown, WV 26505-2888 Telephone: (304) 285-6271 FAX: (304) 285-6075 Email: solenchock@cdc.gov o Direct your questions about the peer review issues to: Gwen Cattledge, Ph.D. Scientific Review Administrator Office of Extramural Programs Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 1600 Clifton Road, N.E. Building 24, Room 1423, MS E-74 Atlanta, GA 30333 Telephone: (404) 498-2508 Fax: (404) 498-2571 Email: gcattledge@cdc.gov o Direct inquiries about financial or grants management matters to: Larry Guess Acting Chief Acquisition and Assistance Field Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 626 Cochrans Mill Road Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236-0070 Announcement Number OH-03-004 Telephone: (412) 386-6826 Email: lguess@cdc.gov LETTER OF INTENT Prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information: o Descriptive title of the proposed program o Name, address, and telephone number of the Principal Investigator o Names of other key personnel o Participating institutions o Number and title of this RFA Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of an application, the information that it contains allows NIOSH staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review. The letter of intent is to be sent by the date listed at the beginning of this document and should be sent to: Gwen Cattledge, Ph.D. Scientific Review Administrator Office of Extramural Programs National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health/CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.E. Building 24, Room 1423, MS E-74 Atlanta, GA 30333 Telephone (404) 498-2508 Fax (404) 498-2571 Email: gcattledge@cdc.gov SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION Applications must be prepared using the PHS 398 research grant application instructions and forms (rev. 5/2001). The PHS 398 is available at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html in an interactive format. For further assistance contact GrantsInfo, Telephone 301/710-0267, Email: GrantsInfo@nih.gov. SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS: Information to prepare a detailed budget is provided in the instructions. If the proposed project involves organizations or persons other than those affiliated with the applicant organization, letters of support and/or cooperation must be included. Note: Type density and size of the entire application must conform to the limits provided in the PHS 398 instructions on page 3. USING THE RFA LABEL: The RFA label available in the PHS 398 (rev. 5/2001) application form must be affixed to the bottom of the face page of the application. Type the RFA number on the label. Failure to use this label could result in delayed processing of the application such that it may not reach the review committee in time for review. In addition, the RFA title and number must be typed on line 2 of the face page of the application form and the YES box must be marked. The RFA label is also available at: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/labels.pdf SENDING AN APPLICATION TO THE NIH: Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including the Checklist, and three signed photocopies, in one package to: Center for Scientific Review (CSR) National Institutes of Health 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040, MSC 7710 Bethesda, MD 20892-7710 Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service) At the time of submission, two additional copies of the application must also be sent to: Gwen Cattledge, Ph.D. Scientific Review Administrator Office of Extramural Programs National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health/CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.E. Building 24, Room 1423, MS E-74 Atlanta, GA 30333 Telephone (404) 498-2508 Fax (404) 498-2571 Email: gcattledge@cdc.gov APPLICATION PROCESSING: Applications must be received on or before the application receipt date listed in the heading of this RFA. If an application is received after that date, it will be returned to the applicant without review. Although there is no immediate acknowledgement of the receipt of an application, applicants are generally notified of the review and funding assignment within 8 weeks. The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) and NIOSH/CDC will not accept any application in response to this RFA that is essentially the same as one currently pending initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending application. However, when a previously unfunded application, originally submitted as an investigator-initiated application, is to be submitted in response to this RFA, it is to be prepared as a NEW application. That is the application for the RFA must not include an Introduction describing the changes and improvements made, and the text must not be marked to indicate the changes. While the investigator may still benefit from the previous review, the RFA application is not to state explicitly how. PEER REVIEW PROCESS Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by CSR and program responsiveness by NIOSH/CDC. Incomplete and/or non-responsive applications will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. Applications that are complete and responsive to the RFA will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer review group convened by NIOSH/CDC in accordance with the review criteria stated below. As part of the initial merit review, all applications will: o Receive a written critique. o Undergo a process in which only those applicants deemed to have the highest merit, generally the top half of the applications under review, will be discussed and assigned a priority score. o Receive a second level of review by the NIOSH/CDC Secondary Review Committee. REVIEW CRITERIA The criteria that NIOSH will use to review applications for scientific merit and for meeting program objectives are provided below. In the written comments, reviewers will be asked to discuss the following aspects of your application in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals: o Significance o Approach o Innovation o Investigator o Environment The scientific review group will address and consider each of these criteria in assigning your application's overall score, weighting them as appropriate for each application. Your application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact and thus deserve a high priority score. For example you may propose to carry out important work that by its nature is not innovative but essential to move a field forward. (1) SIGNIFICANCE: Does this study address an important problem related to intervention/prevention research issues outlined in this announcement? If the aims of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be advanced? What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or methods that drive this field? Describe the significance of the proposed intervention(s) and the number of people likely to benefit. (2) APPROACH: Are the conceptual framework, design (including composition of study population), methods, and analyses adequately developed, well- integrated, and appropriate to the purpose of reducing injuries, illness, and/or hazard exposure to agricultural workers? Describe the feasibility of the intervention and the value of adoption and sustainability of the intervention (e.g. the impact of trends in agriculture, support by partners and stakeholders, costs of implementation, effects on production, and community norms). Do you acknowledge potential problem areas and consider alternative tactics? Does the proposal include involvement of agricultural workers, communities, and other stakeholders in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the intervention? Is the proposed evaluation system detailed and capable of measuring program progress, effectiveness, impact, and outcome? (3) INNOVATION: Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or methods? Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies? (4) INVESTIGATOR: Are you appropriately trained and well-suited to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to your experience level as the principal investigator and to that of other researchers, if any? (5) ENVIRONMENT: Does the scientific environment in which your work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed experiments take advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is there support and commitment by partners/stakeholders (e.g. agricultural workers, agricultural organizations, agribusiness) in the development of this project. Is there documentation of cooperation from industry, unions, communities, or other participants in the project, where applicable? Is there evidence of institutional support and availability of resources necessary to perform the project? ADDITIONAL REVIEW CRITERIA: In addition to the above criteria, the following items will be considered in the determination of scientific merit and the priority score: o PROTECTIONS OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FROM RESEARCH RISK: The involvement of human subjects and protections from research risk relating to their participation in the proposed research will be assessed. (See criteria included in the section on Federal Citations, below). o INCLUSIONS OF WOMEN, MINORITIES AND CHILDREN IN RESEARCH: The adequacy of plans to include subject from both genders, all racial and ethnic groups (and subgroups), and children as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research. Plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects will also be evaluated. (See Inclusion Criteria in the sections on Federal Citations, below). o CARE AND USE OF VERTEBRATE ANIMALS IN RESEARCH: If vertebrate animals are to be used in the project, the five items described under Section f of the PHS 398 research grant application instructions (rev. 5/2001 will be assessed). ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS o BUDGET: The reasonableness of the proposed budget and the requested period of support in relation to the proposed research. PROGRAMMATIC REVIEW CRITERIA: o Magnitude of the problem in terms of numbers of workers affected. o Severity of the disease or injury in the worker population. o Likelihood of developing applied technical knowledge for the prevention of occupational safety and health hazards on a national or regional basis. RECEIPT AND REVIEW SCHEDULE Letter of Intent Receipt Date: May 27, 2003 Application Receipt Date: June 13, 2003 Anticipated Award Date: September 1, 2003 AWARD CRITERIA Award criteria that will be used to make award decisions include: o Program merit o Availability of funds o Programmatic priorities o Balance of program areas and geographic balance. REQUIRED FEDERAL CITATIONS HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION: Federal regulations (45CFR46) require that applications and proposals involving human subjects must be evaluated with reference to the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection against these risks, the potential benefits of the research to the subjects and others, and the importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained. All awardees of CDC grants and cooperative agreements and their performances sites engaged in human subjects research must file an assurance of compliance with the regulations and have continuing reviews of the research protocol by appropriate institutional review boards. In order to obtain a federal-wide Assurance (FWA) of Protection for Human Subjects, the applicant must complete an on-line application at the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) website or write to the OHRP for an application. OHRP will verify that the signatory official and the Human Subjects Protections Administrator have completed the OHRP Assurance Training/Education Module before approving the FWA. Existing Multiple Project Assurances (MPAs), Cooperative Project Assurances (CPAs), and Single Project Assurances (SPAs) remain in full effect until they expire or until December 31, 2003, whichever comes first. To obtain a FWA contact the OHRP at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/assurances/assurances_index.html or write to: Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) Department of Health and Human Services 6100 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3B01, MSC 7501 Rockville, Maryland 20892-7507 (Note: For Express or Hand Delivered Mail, Use Zip Code 20852) Note: In addition to other applicable committees, Indian Health Service (IHS) institutional review committees must also review the project if any component of IHS will be involved with or will support the research. If any American Indian community is involved, its tribal government must also approve the applicable portion of that project. INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS: It is the policy of the NIOSH/CDC to ensure that individuals of both sexes and the various racial and ethnic groups will be included in NIOSH/CDC-supported research projects involving human subjects, whenever feasible and appropriate. Racial and ethnic groups are those defined in OMB Directive No. 15 and include American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander. Applicants shall ensure that women, racial and ethnic minority populations are appropriately represented in applications for research involving human subjects. Where clear and compelling rationale exist that inclusion is inappropriate or not feasible, this situation must be explained as part of the application. This policy does not apply to research studies when the investigator cannot control the race, ethnicity, and/or sex of subjects. Further guidance to this policy is contained in the Federal Register, Vol. 60, No. 179, pages 47947-47951, and dated Friday, September 15, 1995. All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the "NIH Guidelines For Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research," published in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts on August 2, 2000 (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-048.html); a complete copy of the updated Guidelines are available at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_amended_10_2001.htm INCLUSION OF CHILDREN AS PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS: The NIH maintains a policy that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21) must be included in all human subjects research, conducted or supported by the NIH, unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include them. This policy applies to all initial (Type 1) applications submitted for receipt dates after October 1, 1998. This policy will be followed by NIOSH/CDC for this announcement. All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the "NIH Policy and Guidelines on the inclusion of children as participants in research involving human subjects" that is available at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm ANIMAL SUBJECTS REQUIREMENTS: If the proposed project involves research on animal subjects, compliance with the APHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals by Awardee Institution is required. An applicant (as well as each subcontractor or cooperating institution that has immediate responsibility for animal subjects) proposing to use vertebrate animals in CDC-supported activities must file (or have on file) the Animal Welfare Assurance with the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW) at the National Institutes of Health. The applicant must provide in the application the assurance of compliance number and evidence of review and approval (including the date of the most recent approval) by the Institutional Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Web page https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/olaw.htm STANDARDS FOR PRIVACY OF INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFIABLE HEALTH INFORMATION: The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issued final modification to the "Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information", the "Privacy Rule," on August 14, 2002. The Privacy Rule is a federal regulation under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 that governs the protection of individually identifiable health information, and is administered and enforced by the DHHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR). Those who must comply with the Privacy Rule (classified under the Rule as "covered entities") must do so by April 14, 2003 (with the exception of small health plans which have an extra year to comply). Decisions about applicability and implementation of the Privacy Rule reside with the researcher and his/her institution. The OCR website (http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/) provides information on the Privacy Rule, including a complete Regulation Text and a set of decision tools on "Am I a covered entity?" Information on the impact of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on NIH processes involving the review, funding, and progress monitoring of grants, cooperative agreements, and research contracts can be found at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-025.html. URLS IN NIOSH/CDC GRANT APPLICATIONS OR APPENDICES: All applications for NIOSH/CDC funding must be self-contained within specified page limitations. Unless otherwise specified in a NIOSH/CDC solicitation, internet addresses (URLs) should not be used to provide information necessary to the review because reviewers are under no obligation to view the Internet sites. Reviewers are cautioned that their anonymity may be compromised when they directly access an Internet site. LOBBYING RESTRICTIONS: Applicants should be aware of restrictions on the use of Health and Human Services (DHHS) funds for lobbying of Federal or State legislative bodies. Under the provisions of 31 U.S.C. Section 1352, recipients (and their subtier contractors) are prohibited from using appropriated Federal funds (other than profits from a Federal contract) for lobbying congress or any Federal agency in connection with the award of a particular contract, grant, cooperative agreement, or loan. This includes grants/cooperative agreements that, in whole or in part, involve conferences for which Federal funds cannot be used directly or indirectly to encourage participants to lobby or to instruct participants on how to lobby. In addition, no part of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) appropriated funds shall be used, other than for normal and recognized executive-legislative relationships, for publicity or propaganda purposes, for the preparation, distribution, or use of any kit, pamphlet, booklet, publication, radio, television, or video presentation designed to support or defeat legislation pending before the Congress or any State or local legislature, except in presentation to the Congress or any State or local legislature itself. No part of the appropriated funds shall be used to pay the salary or expenses of any grant or contract recipient, or agent acting for such recipient, related to any activity designed to influence legislation or appropriations pending before the Congress or any State or local legislature. Any activity designed to influence action in regard to a particular piece of pending legislation would be considered lobbying. That is lobbying for or against pending legislation, as well as indirect or grass roots: lobbying efforts by award recipients that are directed at inducing members of the public to contact their elected representatives at the Federal or State levels to urge support of, or opposition to, pending legislative proposals is prohibited. As a matter of policy, NIOSH/CDC extends the prohibitions to lobbying with respect to local legislation and local legislative bodies. The provisions are not intended to prohibit all interaction with the legislative branch, or to prohibit educational efforts pertaining to public health. Clearly there are circumstances when it is advisable and permissible to provide information to the legislative branch in order to foster implementation of prevention strategies to promote public health. However, it would not be permissible to influence, directly or indirectly, a specific piece of pending legislation. It remains permissible to use NIOSH/CDC funds to engage in activity to enhance prevention; collect and analyze data; publish and disseminate results of research and surveillance data; implement prevention strategies; conduct community outreach services; provide leadership and training; and foster safe and healthful environments. Recipients of NIOSH/CDC grants and cooperative agreements need to be careful to prevent NIOSH/CDC funds from being used to influence or promote pending legislation. With respect to conferences, public events, publication, and "grass roots" activities that relate to specific legislation, recipients of NIOSH/CDC funds should give attention to isolating and separating the appropriate use of NIOSH/CDC funds from non-NIOSH/CDC funds. NIOSH/CDC also cautions recipients of NISOH?CDC funds to be careful not to give the appearance that NIOSH/CDC funds are being used to carry out activities in a manner that is prohibited under Federal law. SMALL, MINORITY, AND WOMEN-OWNED BUSINESS: It is a national policy to place a fair share of purchases with small, minority and women-owned business firms. The Department of Health and Human Services is strongly committed to the objective of this policy and encourages all recipients of its grants and cooperative agreements to take affirmative steps to ensure such fairness. In particular, recipients should: 1. Place small, minority, women-owned business firms on bidders mailing lists. 2. Solicit these firms whenever they are potential sources of supplies, equipment, construction, or services. 3. Where feasible, divide total requirements into smaller needs, and set delivery schedules that will encourage participation by these firms. 4. Use the assistance of the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce, the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, DHHS, and similar state and local offices. RESEARCH INTEGRITY: The signature of the institution official on the face page of the application submitted under this Program Announcement is certifying compliance with the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) regulations in Title 42 Part 50, Subpart A, entitled "Responsibility of PHS Awardee and Applicant Institutions for Dealing with and Reporting Possible Misconduct in Science." The regulation places several requirements on institutions receiving or applying for funds under the PHS Act that are monitored by the DHHS Office of Research Integrity's (ORI) Assurance Program. For examples: Section 50.103(a) of the regulation states: "Each institution that applies for or receives assistance under the Act for any project or program which involves the conduct of biomedical or behavioral research must have an assurance satisfactory to the Secretary (DHHS) that the applicant: (1) Has established an administrative process, that meets the requirements of this subpart, for reviewing, investigating, and reporting allegations of misconduct in science in connection with PHS-sponsored biomedical and behavioral research conducted at the applicant institution or sponsored by the applicant; and (2) Will comply with its own administrative process and the requirements of this Subpart." Section 50.103(b) of the regulation states that: "an applicant or recipient institution shall make an annual submission to the (ORI) as follows: (1) The institution's assurance shall be submitted to the (ORI), on a form prescribed by the Secretary,...and updated annually thereafter...(2) An institution shall submit, along with its annual assurance, such aggregate information on allegations, inquiries, and investigations as the Secretary may prescribe." HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010: The Public Health Service (PHS)is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2010", a PHS-let national activity for setting priority areas. This RFA is related to one or more of the priority areas. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2010" at http://www.healthypeople.gov/. AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS: This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance at http://www.cfda.gov/ and is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review. Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301(a) [42 U.S.C. 241(a)], the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, Section 20(a) [29 U.S.C. 669(a)] [number: 93.956, Agricultural Health and Safety Program of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)], and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92. The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and discourage the use of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care, health care, or early childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American people.
Return to NIH Guide Main Index
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
||||||||
Note: For help accessing PDF, RTF, MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Audio or Video files, see Help Downloading Files. |